Wound Man

News Mash: Great Infographs of Hand Acupressure Points & Wound Man To Use In Daily Life?

The internet is filled with insightful infographs…

To help satisfy the minds of the curious seekers of “Why do you even NEED to know that” information?

And thank gawd for them.

THIS (below) pic of Acupressure points on your hand, to help cure what ails you?

Absolutely, palm-gropingly fascinating.

[via Body n Soul on Pinterest]

[Read More]

Definitely enough to make me wanna test some of those Acupressure points out on myself:

“Hello, #60 Hypertension…I’m looking at YOU!”

Do I believe in this type of Pseudoscience?

When it comes to infographs…

Don’t see the harm in trying it out.

It’s cheaper than a doctor’s visit, and if it doesn’t work? Your not out of any cash, and only minus a bit of perceived sanity, by those around you, who witnessed you groping your own hand to a mindless distraction.

Pffft, and honestly, it’s not like they haven’t caught you doing worse. So no big.

Now you wanna talk about “harm” in testing the validity of “Why do you even NEED to know that” infographs?

Yeah…

“Wound Man” instantly comes to mind.

[via Welcome Library]

Wound Man

Late medieval anatomy works often contain a standard set of illustrations, copied and recopied from text to text. Typically, these depict the body front and back; the skeleton and muscles within it each from the same two viewpoints, and so on. Strangest to our modern eyes is the illustration that usually comes last: the Wound Man, a compendium of all the injuries that a body might sustain. Captions beside the stoic figure describe the injuries and sometimes give prognoses: often precise distinctions are drawn between types of injuries, such as whether an arrow has embedded itself in a muscle or shot right through.

…[Read More]

No need to try any of THAT out at all.

Though the idiot driving in front of me, on my way to work tonight, who turned on their right blinker, to make a left-hand turn, which almost resulted in a very nasty accident by me running my Nissan Titan up their ass–…

Pirations.

Definitely has me considering.

*vigorously rubs Hypertension point on hand*

Science genetically engineering vampires & species specifically designed to kill? Bad idea.

This is a huge risk…

Nevertheless, I’m going to go out on a crazy-insanely dangerous limb and state for the record?

Developing, genetically engineering  ANYTHING in science relatively similar to zombies, serial killers, werewolves…

And FREAKING VAMPIRES!!!!!!!!

Bad thing.

Bad, bad, bad, bad-bad, thing:

[via io9] Vampire bacteria could become the ultimate antibiotic

A bacterium found in sewage water could revolutionize modern medicine. It’s basically the bacterial equivalent of a vampire, spending its time hunting other bacteria and sucking out all their nutrients. This could revolutionize antibotics and stop the rise of “super bugs.”

The bacterium in question is called Micavibrio aeruginosavorus. Scientists have known about it for a good thirty years, but it’s proven extremely difficult to study using traditional techniques. University of Virginia researchers have only just managed to decode its genome and figure out how it works, and their findings are intriguing.

Micavibrio aeruginosavorus survives by finding certain other strains of bacteria. It then attaches itself to its prey’s cell wall and begins leeching on the victim’s nutrients. That’s unusual for bacteria, most of which simply harvest nutrients from the surrounding environment. For whatever reason, that isn’t an option for this bacterium, which has to rely on finding and destroying other bacteria to live.

At least one of its preferred victims is an enemy of humans. Pseudomonas aeruginosavorus causes serious lung infections in cystic fibrosis patients. It’s early days yet, but the researchers say it would be possible to use Micavibrio aeruginosavorus against this deadly pathogen, injecting it nearby and allowing it to hunt down and destroy the infectious bacteria.

Chief researcher Martin Wu adds:

“Pathologists may eventually be able to use this bacterium to fight fire with fire, so to speak, as a bacterium that will aggressively hunt for and attack certain other bacteria that are extremely harmful to humans.

It is possible that a living antibiotic such as M. aeruginosavorus — because it so specifically targets certain pathogens — could potentially reduce our dependence on traditional antibiotics and help mitigate the drug-resistance problem we are now facing.

This vampire bacterium could well prove to be an extremely appealing alternative to common antibiotics, which work by inhibiting bacteria reproduction or breaking down their cell walls. The problem is that certain bacterial strains have developed resistance to these antibiotics, creating new breeds of so-called super bugs. Micavibrio aeruginosavorus is an intriguing alternative because bacteria can’t build up resistance to a predator in the same way they can a traditional antibiotic.

And because this bacterium only hunts a very select number of strains, it wouldn’t pose any threat to the myriad of beneficial bacteria that we rely on in our body. It also can get through difficult environments, like the viscous mucus film created by Pseudomonas aeruginosavorus, and reach its target in cases where traditional antibiotics would be significantly less effective.

Of course, the bacterium isn’t yet ready to be injected into the human body. It will likely take significant genetic engineering to get it to the point where it can hunt down the desired bacteria strains while leaving others alone. But this is potentially a huge breakthrough, and the fact that we already have the genome mapped is a very encouraging start. [Read More]

But apparently, me being of sound mind (Unlike these mad scscientists currently running amok) & body?

DON’T necessarily feel the same way.

Nope…

Not at all.

[via NYTimes]These mosquitoes are genetically engineered to kill — their own children.

Derric Nimmo/Oxitec

Oxitec injected DNA into mosquito eggs to modify the species.

Researchers on Sunday reported initial signs of success from the first release into the environment of mosquitoes engineered to pass a lethal gene to their offspring, killing them before they reach adulthood.

The results, and other work elsewhere, could herald an age in which genetically modified insects will be used to help control agricultural pests and insect-borne diseases like dengue fever and malaria.

But the research is arousing concern about possible unintended effects on public health and the environment, because once genetically modified insects are released, they cannot be recalled. [Read More]

Engineered to kill?

Jeez.

What could POSSIBLY go wrong with that?

And they wonder WHY normal people (you know, NOT them)…

Look at them like a bunch of ego driven whack jobs with a very low public opinion?

[via New Scientist] [...] Cut loose from objective truth, America’s public dialogue has become one of warring opinions and policy paralysis. Progress is made by brute authority, over the laws, despite the data, and against the will of opponents – the very situation Locke and Jefferson were hoping to avoid.

Anti-science ideology has taken hold before, differently, but history may provide some lessons. The fundamental elements were similar when the Soviet Union elevated the ideology of Lysenkoism ahead of the warnings of geneticists, whom Trofim Lysenko called “caste priests of ivory tower bourgeois pseudoscience”, not unlike Sarah Palin’s characterisations of global warming as “doomsday scare tactics pushed by an environmental priesthood”. Soviet agriculture was set back 40 years.

The political right in Weimar Germany called Einstein’s theory of relativity a “hoax” and said he was in it for the money – much as climate deniers argue today.

During the Nuremberg trials, Hitler’s Minister for Armaments, Albert Speer, recounted the use of new technology to deliver a uniform ideological message, much like today’s political echo chambers: “Through technical devices like the radio and the loudspeaker, 80 million people were deprived of independent thought.” In other words, “Dittoheads”.

In his Great Leap Forward, Mao set forth a plan to transform China into a modern society in 15 years. Scientists who advised against his ideas were harassed or jailed. Mao’s policies led to the greatest famine in human history and the deaths of over 40 million people.

The US is obviously nowhere near any of these situations, but is reaching a crisis point uniquely its own. With every step away from reason and into ideology, the country moves toward a state of tyranny in which public policy comes to be based not on knowledge, but on the most loudly voiced opinions.

The solutions are as multi-faceted as the problem. Above all, scientists must reengage in the national civic dialogue (see opposite) and reasonable politicians should challenge opponents to science-themed policy debates. [Read More]

It kills me how much they DON’T get it. How very much scientists have NO understanding as to why they have such a low public opinion.

And THEY are supposed to e the smart one here.

Craziness.

Boggles the mind.

Really does.

*shakes head sadly*

‘Confirmed’ findings in science have a problem…Replication.

I don’t know about you? But I can’t tell you how many times I have read in the general news media articles that state that we should (paraphrasing) “trust science because it knows what it is talking about and ignore all the idiots that disagree with it”  about *fill in your subject here*.

Anyone who regularly reads this blog knows I am a BIG fan of science, however I have NEVER been a fan of following any science blindly. Science always changes. It’s just part of the process and I’m sorry but any dolt that comes out and says (again, paraphrasing) “The science is %100 percent certain of this” *fill in your subject here*, I just sit back and wait for time to refute the ‘consensus’ on their findings and it usually does…

And not-surprisingly, without much media fan-fair.

When it comes to scientific “facts”: It’s only the truth until it isn’t.

And here, in THIS article,  others are finally beginning to come to the same understanding as well.

About darn time:

Jonah Lehrer has an interesting article in the New Yorker reporting that all sorts of well-establishedmultiply confirmed findings in science have started to look increasingly uncertain as they cannot be replicated.

This phenomenon doesn’t yet have an official name, but it’s occurring across a wide range of fields, from psychology to ecology and in the field of medicine, the phenomenon seems extremely widespread, affecting not only anti-psychotics but also therapies ranging from cardiac stents to Vitamin E and antidepressants. ‘One of my mentors told me that my real mistake was trying to replicate my work,’ says researcher Jonathon Schooler. ‘He told me doing that was just setting myself up for disappointment.’ For many scientists, the effect is especially troubling because of what it exposes about the scientific process. ‘If replication is what separates the rigor of science from the squishiness of pseudoscience, where do we put all these rigorously validated findings that can no longer be proved?’ writes Lehrer. ‘Which results should we believe?‘ Francis Bacon, the early-modern philosopher and pioneer of the scientific method, once declared that experiments were essential, because they allowed us to ‘put nature to the question’ but it now appears that nature often gives us different answers. According to John Ioannidis, author of Why Most Published Research Findings Are False, the main problem is that too many researchers engage in what he calls ‘significance chasing,’ or finding ways to interpret the data so that it passes the statistical test of significance[thus they get the result they WANT and not the truth behind what is THERE] the ninety-five-per-cent boundary invented by Ronald Fisher. ‘The scientists are so eager to pass this magical test that they start playing around with the numbers, trying to find anything that seems worthy,’” [Read More]

I can’t help but find that horribly troublesome…

Especially if one considers all of the monstrous things we have done in the name of ‘science’.

[Click here for a frightening list of 25 of the scariest scientific experiments conducted]