What do you mean

News Mash: By whose standard is one considered “attractive”…Great depends on one’s fertility?

Yes, that post title *points above with a jerking thumb*?

I know what you’re thinking: “You have GOT to be kidding me, with that!!!!!”

Sad thing is?

So not.

Cause, well…

There is good news for (truly) attractive women.

Pffft…

As if they needed more (Looking-at-you-Angelina-Jolie-scoring-Brad-Pitt-you-lucky-b*tch-you!):

[via DailyMail] Attractive women are more than just a pretty face – they also have less of the hormone cortisol, which is associated with stress, a study shows.

Researchers point out that stress can also adversely effect fertility, and suggest one explanation may be that ‘facial attractiveness signals reproductive potential’.

Attractive women also carry just the right amount of fat in their bodies – not too much and not too little, according to the research.

But, contrary to recent research in men, a strong immune system may not be associated with being beautiful.

A study of Latvian women found links between facial attractiveness and their amount of cortisol and fat, but not responsiveness to infection.

Sometimes described as our ‘life-sustaining hormone’, cortisol is produced in the adrenal glands and is responsible for metabolism, energy levels, blood pressure and combating illness.

It is especially important at times when the body experiences intense stress such as surgery, trauma or serious infection.

…[Read More]

Then again…

Who actually judges who is attractive or not?

Cause certainly not You.

You are just WAY too biased, apparently.

However…

How is true beauty identified?

Not by personal opinion apparently.

*grimaces*

[via ScientificAmerican] You Are Less Beautiful Than You Think ~By Ozgun Atasoy

In April 15, 2013 Dove launched a 3-minute video entitled “Dove Real Beauty Sketches.” The video achieved instant popularity and has been watched millions of times — a successful viral campaign which has been widely talked about. In the video, a small group of women are asked to describe their faces to a person whom they cannot see. The person is a forensic artist who is there to draw pictures of the women based on their verbal descriptions. A curtain separates the artist and the women, and they never see each other. Before all this, each woman is asked to socialize with a stranger, who later separately describes the woman to the forensic artist. In the end, the women are shown the two drawings, one based on their own description, the other based on the stranger’s description. Much to their amazement and delight, the women realize that the drawings based on strangers’ descriptions depict much more beautiful women. The video ends: “You are more beautiful than you think.”

The idea is quite appealing. Perhaps too many women are unhappy with their looks. It would be a big relief if we all suddenly realized, like Christian Andersen’s ugly duckling, that we are in fact beautiful.

However, what Dove is suggesting is not actually true. The evidence from psychological research suggests instead that we tend to think of our appearance in ways that are more flattering than are warranted. This seems to be part of a broader human tendency to see ourselves through rose colored glasses. Most of us think that we are better than we actually are — not just physically, but in every way.

…[Read More]

So…

If that’s true?

It does lead me to a Ponderism.

That being?

Huh.

Brad Pitt?

Probably so p*ssed off right about now, isn’t he?

What do you mean [Source]

Are you kidding?!?!

Definitely not.

Just look at that face!

There is NO WAY he could imagine himself any prettier than he is in reality.

*sighs*

And just how unfair, and wonder is that all at the same time, is that?

irrevocably

News Mash: Be it positive or negative, what you consume directly affects your brain!

The brain…

That 3lbs of goodness, tucked neatly between your ears?

Is a lot more sensitive than you could ever imagine.

Sensitive to things that are good FOR it…

[via NatureWorldNews]Low Calorie Diet Protects Brain Cells ~ By Staff Reporter

A new study has found that reducing calories prevents loss of brain cells and slows down cognitive decline.

Calorie restriction is known to prevent aging and reducing the risk of mental conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease. A diet that has fewer calories activates a key enzyme called Sirtuin 1 (SIRT1), which is associated with protection against loss of nerve cells. The study team even found a drug that activates the enzyme and helps the brain retain cognitive abilities.

…[Read More]

And sensitive to things?

That are…

Oh, so BAD for it!

[via ScienceDaily]Individuals Who Drink Heavily and Smoke May Show ‘Early Aging’ of the Brain —

Treatment for alcohol use disorders works best if the patient actively understands and incorporates the interventions provided in the clinic. Multiple factors can influence both the type and degree of neurocognitive abnormalities found during early abstinence, including chronic cigarette smoking and increasing age. A new study is the first to look at the interactive effects of smoking status and age on neurocognition in treatment-seeking alcohol dependent (AD) individuals. Findings show that AD individuals who currently smoke show more problems with memory, ability to think quickly and efficiently, and problem-solving skills than those who don’t smoke, effects which seem to become exacerbated with age.

…[Read More]

Be careful, regarding what you consume

Because when it comes to your brain?

What you take in can either protect it…

Or destroy it.

irrevocably [Source]

al·tru·ism

News Mash: The Just-World Phenomenon, compassion and altruistic behavior!

The fact that we NEED to believe it…

That this world is a fair and just place?

Directly affects our everyday show of compassion, when it comes to horrific events:

[via Psychology.about.com]What Is the Just-World Phenomenon? ~By

Question: What Is the Just-World Phenomenon?

Answer:

The just-world phenomenon is a term referring to people’s tendency to believe that the world is just and that people get what they deserve. Because people want to believe that the world is fair, they will look for ways to explain or rationalize away injustice – often by blaming the victim.

Those with this belief tend to think that when bad things happen to people, it is because these individuals are bad people or have done something to deserve their misfortune. Conversely, this belief also leads people to think that when good things happen to people it is because those individuals are good and deserving of their happy fortune.

Examples of the Just-World Phenomenon

The classic example of this tendency is found in the Book of Job. In the text, Job suffers a series of terrible calamities and at one point, his former friend suggests that Job must have done something terrible to have deserved his misfortunes.

In one famous study, two stories about an interaction between a man and woman was described to participants. Both stories were identical in every way except for the final outcome. In one version of the story the woman is raped, while in the other version the man proposes marriage. In both versions of the story, participants directly linked the two drastically different outcomes to the woman’s actions.

Explanations for the Just-World Phenomenon

There are a few different explanations that have been proposed to explain the just-world phenomenon. First is the idea that people have a need to believe in their own invulnerability. For example, people don’t like to think about themselves being the victims of a violent crime. So when they hear about an even such as an assault or a rape, they will blame the event on the behavior of the victim. By doing this, people can go on believing that they will never be the victim of such a crime because they will simply avoid these behaviors.

Another possible explanation for the just-world phenomenon is that people want to reduce the anxiety that is caused by injustices. Believing that the individual is completely responsible for their misfortune, people are able to go on believing that the world is fair and just.

…[Read More]

But because we do?

We make justifications for the unjustifiable.
We make excuses where there should BE none.
We let our anxiety…

Rule our intrinsic inner instinct for compassion for others.

But does it HAVE to be this way?

No…

No it does not.

[via MedicalXpress] Brain can be trained in compassional·tru·ism

Until now, little was scientifically known about the human potential to cultivate compassion—the emotional state of caring for people who are suffering in a way that motivates altruistic behavior.

A new study by researchers at the Center for Investigating Healthy Minds at the Waisman Center of the University of Wisconsin-Madison shows that adults can be trained to be more compassionate.

The report, published Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, investigates whether training adults in compassion can result in greater altruistic behavior and related changes in neural systems underlying compassion.

“Our fundamental question was, ‘Can compassion be trained and learned in adults? Can we become more caring if we practice that mindset?’” says Helen Weng, lead author of the study and a graduate student in clinical psychology.

“Our evidence points to yes.”

…[Read More]

What am I saying?

Simply this…

Be compassionate for compassion’s SAKE.

Avoid being compassionate…

For only your sake.

Summertime

Summertime is always the best of what might be…With you!

“I almost wish we were butterflies and liv’d but three summer days – three such days with you I could fill with more delight than fifty common years could ever contain.”
― John Keats, Bright Star: Love Letters and Poems of John Keats to Fanny Brawne

Summertime

[Source]

“I fell for her in summer, my lovely summer girl,
From summer she is made, my lovely summer girl,
I’d love to spend a winter with my lovely summer girl,
But I’m never warm enough for my lovely summer girl,
It’s summer when she smiles, I’m laughing like a child,
It’s the summer of our lives; we’ll contain it for a while
She holds the heat, the breeze of summer in the circle of her hand
I’d be happy with this summer if it’s all we ever had.”
Maggie Stiefvater, Shiver

Joyland

News Mash: Stephen King? Killing the joy in eBooks! While Karin Slaughter is…Bustin’ it out!

“Sit in a room and read — and read and read. And read the right books by the right people. Your mind is brought onto that level, and you have a nice, mild, slow-burning rapture all the time. This realization of life can be a constant realization in your living. When you find an author who really grabs you, read everything he has done. Don’t say, ‘Oh, I want to know what So-and-so did’—and don’t bother at all with the best-seller list. Just read what this one author has to give you. And then you can go read what he had read. And the world opens up in a way that is consistent with a certain point of view. But when you go from one author to another, you may be able to tell us the date when each wrote such and such a poem—but he hasn’t said anything to you.”

Joseph Campbell and the Power of Myth, with Bill Moyers

The thing is though…

About reading in this digital age?

Some authors?

Make it so much easier:

[via Amazon]From Karin Slaughter comes a fast and furious tale in which no one is quite who they seem. This electrifying eBook novella featuring Will Trent is a prequel to Slaughter’s upcoming novel, Unseen.

Detective Will Trent is standing in a Georgia convenience store, waiting on an obstinate Icee frozen drink machine. To the surveillance cameras and bored staff of the Lil’ Dixie Gas-n-Go, however, Will appears to be someone very different—the menacing ex-con Bill Black. Going undercover as Bill, the Georgia Bureau of Investigation agent is about to infiltrate the most corrupt town in the most corrupt county in the new American South. But first: his Icee.

Everything changes in one horrific instant, as all hell breaks loose at the Lil’ Dixie. A cop is shot. A bag of cash goes flying across the floor. A young woman disappears while a killer takes off in a battered pick-up truck. Within seconds, Will is in pursuit.

…[Read More - Buy The eBook HERE!]

Than others.

Though the exact reason why?

Is beyond me:

[via DailyMail]Misery for e-books! Stephen King to release his new novel in paper format only ~By Paul Thompson

More than a decade after becoming one of the first authors to publish an e-book, horror writer Stephen King has turned his back on digital publishing.

The best selling writer has refused to allow his latest book Joyland to be published in digital format

He hopes his fans will continue to buy his books in the print form and give a boost to many booksellers worldwide who are struggling to compete against e-books.

‘I have no plans for a digital version,’ King told the Wall St. Journal.

‘Maybe at some point, but in the meantime, let people stir their sticks and go to an actual bookstore rather than a digital one.’

His decision will be welcomed by booksellers who have been hit by a drop in visitors to stores due to the increasing popularity of e-books.

King’s latest book, which is set in North Carolina amusement park in 1973, is tipped to be a best seller.

His decision to turn his back on digital publishing comes as sales of e-books are at an all time high. with 457 million sold last year

Digital books generated $3bn in revenue last year – and increase of 44 per cent on the previous year.

…[Read More]

Kudos to you, Ms. Slaughter.

As for you, Mr. King?

What a killjoy!?

Joyland

Does this mean, however, I will not be reading Mr. King’s new book?

Pffft, hello, we are still talking Stephen King here. So, yes, I will definitely be reading it.

But it might take me awhile to actually GET to book store, hence the “Dang & blast…”

It all, inconvenience.

Jeez.

Ah, well…

Just give me something to look forward to, I suppose.

How about you?

Come on snakes

News Mash: That’s a big snake & that’s ok… Cause this? Is a big ol’ ax!

In case you didn’t know it already…

Florida has an invasive species problem.

And it’s one that just keeps growing, and growing and…

GROWING!

[via CBSLocal]Record-Setting Burmese Python Captured In Miami-Dade CountyJason Leon (left) captured and killed record-setting Burmese python in Miami-Dade.it measured 18-feet, 8-inches and weighed 128 pounds. (Source: FWC)

MIAMI-DADE (CBSMiami) – What would you do if you came across the longest Burmese python ever recorded in the state of Florida? A Miami man had to answer that question recently and he decided to catch and kill it.

Turns out, it was the longest Burmese python ever captured in Florida; it measured 18 feet, 8 inches. The python was a 128-pound female that was not carrying eggs, according to University of Florida scientists who examined the snake. The previous record length for a Burmese python captured in the wild in Florida was 17 feet, 7 inches.

On May 11th, Jason Leon was riding late at night in a rural area of southeast Miami-Dade County when he and his passenger spotted the python. About 3 feet of the snake was sticking out of the roadside brush. Leon stopped his car, grabbed the snake behind its head and started dragging it out of the brush. When the snake began to wrap itself around his leg, he called for assistance from others and then used a knife to kill the snake. Leon once owned Burmese pythons as pets and has experience handling this non-venomous constrictor species.

“Jason Leon’s nighttime sighting and capture of a Burmese python of more than 18 feet in length is a notable accomplishment that set a Florida record. The FWC is grateful to him both for safely removing such a large Burmese python and for reporting its capture,” said Kristen Sommers, Exotic Species Coordination Section Leader for the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC).

Leon reported his python capture to the FWC’s South Region office, which connected him with 888-IveGot1 (888-483-4861), the FWC’s hotline for reporting exotic species.

Cheryl Millett of The Nature Conservancy’s Python Patrol Program helped coordinate the response, and Jeff Fobb of the Miami-Dade Fire Rescue Venom Response Program arranged to pick up the snake from Leon.

Finally, the python was turned over to the University of Florida’s Fort Lauderdale Research and Education Center, where UF staff experienced in working with Burmese pythons performed the necropsy.

“With the help of people like Mr. Leon and our ongoing partnerships with other agencies, the FWC is advancing what we know about Burmese pythons in Florida,” Sommers said. “This event highlights how the Exotic Species hotline allows the public to help us obtain more information about Burmese pythons, so we can improve management of this invasive species. It also reflects the cooperative efforts of the FWC and its partners to address python sightings by the public.”

…[Read More]

I can’t be the only one who got the heebie-jeebies reading that article.

I mean, GAH…

18 feet of snake, can you even imagine it?

Whoa, I definitely can.

And because I can?

Yeah…

THIS (see article below):

[via Gizmodo] The 5 Types of Ax Everyone Should Know ~Andrew Tarantola

The forest isn’t just going to lay down and stack itself into timber piles because you asked nicely. You’ll need to fell, chop, and hew it into submission. Here are the tools to do it.

Come on snakes

Felling Axes

First things first, if you want to knock down trees you’re going to need a felling ax. These are designed with an extremely sharp, thin blade (or “bit”) and slowly tapered head in order to cut across the wood grain as deeply as possible with every stroke. To that end, felling axes tend to have mid-weight heads—about 2.5 to 3.5 pounds—and have a 28- to 36-inch handle. This makes them ideal for creating stumps and lopping off the limbs of downed trees. There are many variations to the basic felling ax design, often bearing the name of the region it was developed such as Michigan or Dayton axes.


Hudson Bay Axes

Fitted with a smaller head and handle than a felling ax, the one-handed Hudson Bay is what’s known as a 3/4 ax. Developed in the 17th century by French fur traders working the Hudson Bay trade routes, its 2-pound head and 22- to 28-inch handle make it perfect for trimming limbs and small chopping jobs. You won’t take down a Sequoia with it, but a Hudson Bay will quickly turn a pile of medium-size logs into kindling.


Splitting Mauls

Rather than cut deeply across the grain as a felling ax does, a splitting maul utilizes a heavy wedge-shaped head designed to rend logs along the grain. These axes feature a 6- to 8-pound head, which delivers a more forceful strike without becoming stuck in the wood, and a nearly straight handle, which allows the user to lever the maul deeper into the split after the initial strike. Mauls also have a broad butt (the rear face of the head) that can be used to hammer a second splitter through the log.

…[Read More - See All Five HERE!]

Makes me wanna go out and invest in all five kinds…

You know, just to be safe.

How about you?

Robot goal

News Mash: ‘Hedonistic Robots” are just one more reason why we are heading towards a Mass Extinction!

In case you have never been to it…

You definitely should!

The wonderful website, dedicated to all things science-like, io9 is full of fascinating information.

Such as?

Oh, 7 signs that we are…

All about to DIE!!!!!!!

Ohemgee.

[via io9] 7 Signs We Are Heading for a Mass Extinction ~by Annalee Newitz

Today, many scientists believe we are on the cusp of a sixth mass extinction which could wipe out most life on Earth as we know it. Here are seven signs that they could be right.

Image of Australian wildfires from space, via NASA

A mass extinction happens when over 75 percent of all species on the planet die in a period of less than two million years. That may sound long to you, but it’s the blink of an eye in geologic time. There have been five mass extinctions on Earth over the past 540 million years, sometimes caused by catastrophic disasters, and sometimes by quiet, insidious events like invasive species taking over the planet.

7. Earth Is Bubbling with Super Volcanoes
Yellowstone Park in the United States is actually a volcano caldera, a thin cork of earth that sits on top of a massive cache of broiling magma. And this super-volcano could blow any time. The last time Earth witnessed an explosion of this size was in 1812, when Mount Tambora in Indonesia erupted so profusely that the Earth’s climate cooled for several years afterwards. Even more frightening is the prospect that another kind of super volcano, called a large igneous province (LIP), could become active sometime in the future. A now-inactive LIP, called the Siberian Traps, erupted 250 million years ago. It spewed so much sulfur, carbon other greenhouse gases into the air that the Earth experienced a climate change catastrophe, vacillating wildly between extreme heat and cold until 95 percent of all life had died. This mass extinction was so bad it’s been nicknamed “the Great Dying” by geologists. Yellowstone is not a LIP, but if it explodes into a super eruption, the damage will be incredible. Super volcanoes are an ever-present threat, that have haunted the Earth for millions of years.

6. Invasive Species Are Everywhere
On Earth, humans have aggressively invaded every continent except Antarctica, swelling our population to over 7 billion individuals and eating everything in sight. Like rats and cockroaches, we are the ultimate invasive species, pushing many creatures out of their native habitats — which could, ultimately, kill those creatures on a huge scale. Our population could grow a lot bigger before humans are endangered, but that doesn’t mean we wouldn’t harm other species. About 359 million years ago, 75 percent of all species on Earth died during the Devonian mass extinction. Geologist Alicia Stigall has evidence that this horrific slaughter was the result of invasive species like sharks (yes, there were sharks hundreds of millions of years ago) aggressively eating all the food in every environment — slowly starving all the creatures who depended on local food sources and couldn’t move to new feeding regions.

…[Read More - See All 7 Signs HERE!]

Informative.

And?

More than a little scary.

But…

As much as I adore their thoroughness?

I’m pretty sure they forgot a very IMPORTANT sign, that our immanent doom inches ever closer.

And?

Oh, yeah…

It’s a biggie:

[via LiveScience]Hedonistic Robots Could Destroy Humanity ~by Marshall Honorof, TechNewsDaily Staff Writer

Complex robots are like animals: They learn by doing. Future robots may even respond to reward systems: complete a task with aplomb, and a gain a “feeling” of satisfaction for a job well done.

While this technology could create more efficient, goal-oriented robots, it could also have some very dire ramifications for humanity. After all, robots that feel rewarded by making humans happy may eventually decide that if no humans exist, no human will ever be unhappy again.

“Robots without preferences can’t have complicated behaviors,” Roman V. Yampolskiy, director of the Cybersecurity Research Lab at the University of Louisville, told TechNewsDaily. “To make machines which are independent and creative, we need to give them rewards and preferences.”

While Yampolskiy believes that robots can be indispensible tools, he also warns that as they learn to seek rewards, they may learn to circumvent helping humans. “I am trying to make sure that any AI software we develop is safe to use and beneficial to humanity,” he said.

Yampolskiy asserts that robots with the capacity for feelings of pleasure would, in all likelihood, take all the same shortcuts that humans use to acquire it. In a recent paper, he described the process of “wireheading,” which sent an electric jolt through the pleasure center of a rat’s brain. “The rat’s self-stimulation behavior completely displaced all interest in sex, sleep, food and water, ultimately leading to premature death,” Yampolskiy wrote.

Humans, he argued, wirehead as well, although in less direct ways. Counterfeiting, cheating and engaging in recreational sex are all ways of plugging directly into the brain’s pleasure centers while bypassing the associated work. Counterfeiters need not earn money, cheaters need not study and lovers need not raise children.

Intelligent robots will differ from humanity in one key area: They will know (or at least have the capacity to know) exactly how their own brains work. While humans can only feel pleasure through real-life experience (such as sexual intercourse or thrill-seeking) or simulacra (such as pornography or video games), robots could tap into their own software to reward themselves without doing any work.

Worse still, a number of scenarios envision hedonistic robots doing away with humanity entirely. If humans have the ability to reward or punish robots, simply killing their human overseers and taking control of the process would allow robots to feel pleasure indefinitely.

Furthermore, a robot designed specifically with people’s welfare in mind could make a deadly leap in logic. “Killing all people trivially satisfies this request as with 0 people around all of them are happy,” Yampolskiy wrote.

…[Read More]

*sighs*

Humanities demise.

Not so much a matter of “if” as it is more of a matter of “when”…

And how freaking bad will it hurt.

It’s almost depressing, isn’t it?

But no worries…

I have just the thing that will make you feel better:

There…

How’s that?

And sure…

Although the perfect pizza will not make our sure-to-be-coming painful, inevitable end any less so?

It will make facing the coming end much more bearable.

Plus, look at it this way…

You won’t have to worry about needing to diet after your perfect pizza.

Always a positive, cause “diet”…

Pffft, who wants to have to do that?

*shakes head sadly*

Robot goal

What's me without you

What’s me without you?

Me without you is like a sneaker without laces, a Geek without braces, andasentencewithoutspaces.

What's me without you

Me without you is like Pepsi without cans. Pedophiles without vans. Jersey shore without tans.
Me without you is like Facebook with no friends, YouTube with no videos, and Google with no results.
Me without you that’s the longest never. Living like sunshine man we on forever. ~ Big Sean
Me without you is like a pot head who’s not high.
Me without you is like a plane that doesn’t fly.
Me without you is like a heart missing its beat.

Deactivated

News Mash: Caffeine deactivated in gum, but not in human cloning?

Huh.

Ooohhhh…

OK.

Using caffeine to clone H U M A N stem cells?

Totally AWESOME!

[via RawStory]Breakthrough: Scientists use caffeine to clone stem cells from human skin ~by Stephen C. Webster

Human stem cells have for the first time been cloned from adult skin cells through the use of hollowed-out embryos as a type of organic petri dish, scientists at Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU) announced Wednesday in a study published by the scientific journal Cell. And in a surprising twist, the discovery was made possible thanks to everybody’s favorite stimulant: caffeine.

Scientists led by Dr. Shoukhrat Mitalipov took donated egg cells and ripped out their DNA using a technique called somatic cell nuclear transfer, replacing it with DNA pulled from an adult’s skin cells.

The idea behind this technique is that the stem cells which might grow in the cloned embryo would be a perfect match for the skin cell donor, who then could benefit from the adaptive reconstruction therapies that stem cells offer. Scientists have tried for years to make this work with human cells, but to no avail. However, once OHSU researchers figured out how to make it work with monkeys and mice, it was only a matter of time before human stem cell cloning became reality.

Dr. Mitalipov explained in an advisory that the stem cells his team produced were able to convert themselves “into several different cell types, including nerve cells, liver cells and heart cells,” just like normal stem cells.

The trick to getting the cells growing, they discovered, was a little bit of electricity and a dab of caffeine. “The Starbucks experiment,” Mitalipov quipped to NPR.

…[Read More]

But chewing caffeine gum?

Apparently…

Science (via the FDA) thinks is a really BAD idea.

[via NYDailyNews] Wrigley pulls caffeinated Alert Energy gum amid FDA concerns ~By Tracy MillerDeactivated

Wrigley has put its caffeinated chewing gum to rest, at least for now.

The company announced Wednesday it has “paused” sales of its new Alert Energy, which boasted 40 mg of caffeine per piece, the same buzz as a half-cup of coffee.

The decision follows last week’s announcement by the Food and Drug Administration that it is taking a “fresh look” at the effects of added caffeine in foods.

“After discussions with the FDA, we have a greater appreciation for its concern about the proliferation of caffeine in the nation’s food supply,” Casey Keller, Wrigley’s president for North America, said in a statement, adding that the company had marketed Alert Energy “in a safe and responsible manner to consumers 25 years and older.”

Amid the exploding sales of highly caffeinated energy drinks, the stimulant is also popping up in kid-friendly foods like potato chips and candy.

The FDA hasn’t reexamined the use of caffeine in food or drink since the 1950s, when it was approved for colas, the agency’s deputy commissioner of foods, Michael Taylor, told the Associated Press.

The new trend in caffeinated food products is “disturbing” and “beyond anything FDA envisioned,” Taylor said.

…[Read More]

Yeah, Science…

You make so much sense, with your consistencies?

Sometimes it’s scary!

But, hey…

It’s why I love you.

No, really…

I do.

A whole lots!

*wink*

Keep Calm And Call The Doctor

News Mash: Sure this video of a fake Doctor Who website is funny. Unless? You’re in Norwich!

[via Gizmodo]All the Fake Websites from Doctor Who Make Me Wish They Were Real ~by Casey Chan

TV show websites are notoriously bad and comically unreal yet I can’t help but be charmed by their hilarious simplicity (and god awful horribleness). Can you imagine if there were giant flashing RED ALERT messages popping up at you? Or if hacking was as simple as just slapping the keys on the keyboard a few times? I want to exist in this world of fake websites.

…[Read More]

Then?

Oh…

Probably not so much.

Those super sci-fi fans?

Yeah…

They take their Doctor a little TOO seriously.

[via DailyMail] Darth brawl: Rival Star Wars and Doctor Who fans separated by ‘the force’ after police called to ‘fight’ at sci-fi convention ~By Steve Robson

Rival Star Wars and Doctor Who fans had to be separated by ‘the force’ after police were called to reports of a fight at a sci-fi convention.

The family event, hosted at the University of East Anglia, threatened to head towards the dark side after a dispute erupted between members of Norwich Sci-Fi Club and Norwich Star Wars Club.

More than a dozen fans from both groups – including several in fancy dress – were involved in a bitter exchange outside the venue, sparked by the arrival of Jim Poole, treasurer of Norwich Sci-Fi Club.

After approaching Doctor Who actor Graham Cole for an autograph, he was asked to leave prompting a stand-off which was only resolved by the intervention of police and university security guards.

Officers were called to allegations of an assault but after reviewing CCTV decided no further action was necessary and warned the groups to stay apart.

A police spokesman added: ‘After lengthy investigation, talking to witnesses and reviewing good CCTV footage, it was confirmed that there was no assault.

‘The two rival groups were spoken to and advised to keep out of each other’s way.’

The row, which happened on Sunday at around 2.30pm, dates back to a long-running dispute between Norwich Star Wars Club and Norwich Sci-Fi Club and the annual events they organise.

The animosity had escalated in recent weeks with allegations of offensive posts on social networking sites.

Star Wars organiser Richard Walker, 63, said: ‘It has been a long running saga. We aren’t a club to make waves and we have been going for 14 years without any problems until the Norwich Sci-Fi Club started making these demands.

‘Mr Poole turned up with his three friends and were admitted because the person on the door did not recognise them.’

Star Wars Club secretary Dominic Warner added: ‘We are a Star Wars club and they are mostly Doctor Who. We have our events and they have theirs. All this is very childish.

‘They are knocking our reputation and saying we are trading off them, but we have been going for 14 years and we don’t need to trade off anyone. It should be live and let live.’

…[Read More]

And just…

Pffft!

Who thought THAT was even possible. Wow.

The things the internet teaches us.

Live and learn, people…

Live. And. Learn.

Keep Calm And Call The Doctor

Solar flare induced insanity

News Mash: A strong solar flares day, means…A Bad day for psychiatric hospital in Kenya?

Science…

For the most part?

Still blind as to the extent of how solar flares affect us.

[via MyFoxyNY]Sun unleashes strong solar flares ~By MYFOX NEW YORK STAFF

The sun has unleashed four potent solar flares over the past few days, according to NASA.

One of the flares on Sunday was the strongest solar eruption this year and created a solar radiation storm on Wednesday.

NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory captured this image of the X1.2 class solar flare on May 14, 2013.(NASA/SDO)

The flare erupted on the side of the sun that was not facing earth but it did cause a strong radio blackout.  The flare was categorized as an R3 on the NOAA’s space weather scales from R1 to R5.

Experimental NASA research models show that the latest flare left the sun at around 745 miles per second.

NASA says radiation from the latest flare may stream toward two of its spacecraft, including the Spitzer Space Telescope. Engineers have the option to switch them in safe mode to protect instruments.

The side of the sun where Sunday’s eruption occurred will rotate into Earth’s view soon, allowing scientists to study the active region.

Experts say that a rise in solar activity is common right now because of the phase it is in currently in its 11-year activity cycle.  More strong solar flares could be coming in the days ahead.

The flares can temporarily disrupt GPS signals and communications satellites, but most people will not notice any impacts from the flares.

…[Read More]

And, yes…

Believe it or not, Science?

They freaking affect us!

I quote:

“…but most people will not notice any impacts from the flares.”

Seriously, you big goobers?

Jeez, make out a post-it note…

Please:

[via Carlini Institute]How Recent Solar Flares Are Affecting Humans ~by Heather Carlini

A solar flare is a magnetic storm on the Sun which appears to be a very bright spot and a gaseous surface eruption such as in the above photograph.  Solar flares release huge amounts of high-energy particles and gases that are tremendously hot.  They are ejected thousands of miles from the surface of the Sun.

There appears to be a direct connection between the Sun’s solar storms and human biological effect especially after an “M” class solar flare.  The conduit which facilitates the charged particles from the Sun to human disturbance is the very same conduit which steers Earth’s weather through the Magnetic Field on Earth, and also through the magnetic fields around humans.

  Earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, hurricanes, tornadoes, and wind storms appear to happen after strong solar activity on the sun.

Geomagnetic Activity on the Sun Influences our Thoughts

Solar flare induced insanity [Source]

I have noticed in my own research that solar activity is known to influence human consciousness.  Solar flares affect the Central Nervous System (stomach lining), all brain activity (including equilibrium), along with human behaviour and all psycho-physiological (mental-emotional-physical) response.  Solar flares can cause us to be nervous, anxiousness, worrisome, jittery, dizzy, shaky, irritable, lethargic, exhausted, have short term memory problems and heart palpitations, feel nauseous, queasy, and to have prolonged head pressure and headaches.

…[Read More - The Whole Article Is Definitely Worth checking Out, Please Do So HERE!]

As someone who actually works in law enforcement…

And actually SEES firsthand the effects of solar flares via the antics of the general populous?

Let me reassure you?

People going nuts on high solar flare activity days?

Real. Thing.

[via Iquisitr]40 Patients Escape Psychiatric Hospital, 30 Still On The Run ~By Todd Rigney

Of the 40 patients who escaped from a psychiatric hospital in Kenya, only 10 have returned to the facility.

Dozens of people reportedly fled the Mathari Mental Hospital in Nairobi on Sunday morning. Security officers prevented an additional 35 from escaping. It’s believed the patients overpowered the guards before managing to force open the door to their ward.

“Many scaled over the wall and went through Mathare area and a few confident ones used the main gate. When they are traced they should be brought back for their medication,” Police Chief Samuel Anampiu explained.

He added, “They must have strategized. It is not possible that, without proper planning, 75 people can break two doors and more than half of them run away.”

It’s currently believed that 30 patients are still unaccounted for at the psychiatric hospital in Kenya. Anampiu is concerned about these individuals getting the medication they need in order to treat their illnesses.

“We are now talking of 30 mental patients who are not back. Some have come back on their own volition while some were captured and brought back by their relatives,” the police chief said.

Two of the patients who escaped from the hospital later returned on their own free will. Eight of the escapees were brought back to the facility by their families. This mean that 30 of the 40 patients who escaped the psychiatric hospital are still on the loose.

…[Read More]

What am I saying?

Simply this…

When it comes to solar flares?

People go nuts!

Especially, um, let me just call them HIGHLY SENSITIVE people, who seem to be more susceptible than others.

Science…

You should really watch such stupid quotes as “…but most people will not notice any impacts from the flares” because, oh?

You could really not be MORE wrong.

Watch yourself.

Put your future in good hands

Your future is only as indefinite, up in the air, as you choose it to be. Put your future in good hands…Your own!

It is not the mountain we conquer but ourselves.
~Edmund Hillary

Put your future in good hands

[Source]

“While many people are trying to be in tune with infinite, what they really are is in tune with the indefinite.”
~ Eric Butterworth

Made in china

News Mash: Check out these gas masks…No, seriously, thanks to Science? DO!

Today?

Yup…

I find THIS (below) S U P E R interesting:

[via io9] An Illustrated History Of Gas Masks ~Vincze Miklós

The gas mask has a history that dates back thousands of years, though it wasn’t until World War I that it became nightmare fodder for Doctor Who and countless other stories. Here is a sometimes terrifying history of the gas mask, from its beginnings through the present day.

Playing leapfrog, 1934

Above. Able seamen at the Royal Navy Anti-Gas School at Tipnor, Portsmouth play leapfrog wearing gas masks, to accustom them to carrying out strenuous tasks in respirators, on January 22 1934.

(Photo by William Vanderson/Fox Photos/Getty Images)

 

The common sponge, ancient Greece

According to the Popular Mechanics (January 1984):

“The common sponge was used in ancient Greece as a gas mask, a compress, a contraceptive – and, of course, for bathing.”

(via Wikimedia Commons/Tom Oates)

Banū Mūsā Gas Mask, c. 850 A.D

This gas mask was designed by the Banu Musa brothers in Baghdad, Iraq to protect workers working in polluted wells. The device was mentioned in the brothers book “Book of Ingenious Devices” that describes 100 inventions.

(Illustrations are from the brothers’ book, but not about the gas mask, via Wikimedia Commons 12)

Plague Doctor’s Mask

The bird-like beak mask was often filled with sweet or strong smelling herbs or spices – lavender, mint, camphor or dried roses. They’ve believed it would banish the evil smells.

(via Wikimedia Commons/Traité de la peste, 1721 and etsy/Tom Banwell)

Alexander von Humboldt’s mask, 1799

It was the first device with respirator, invented for miners by a Prussian mining official Alexander von Humboldt.

(via Asher Rare Books)

A smoke protecting apparatus for firemen by John and Charles Deane, 1823

In the early 1820s John Deane have seen a burning stable with trapped horses in it. To get through the smoke and rescue all the horses he put on an old knight-in-armor helmet air-pumped by a hose from a fire brigade water pump. The saving was successful, and in 1823 John and Charles Deane have invented the Smoke Helmet:

An apparatus or machine to be worn by persons entering rooms or other places filled with smoke or other vapour, for the purpose of extinguishing fire or extricating persons or property therein.”

The device was a single copper helmet with a long leather hose attached to the rear. A long leather hose was attached to the rear. Five years later it was converted for underwater use.

(via Submerged)

Lewis Haslett: “Inhaler or Lung Protector”, 1847, patented in 1849

It allowed breathing through a nose or mouthpiece fitted with two one-way clapper walves. The filter was made of wool or other porous substances with water could keeping out dust.

(via Google Patent Search)

The charcoal air-filter of John Stenhouse, 1854 (patented in 1860 and 1867)

 

In the copper-framed mask there was powdered wood charcoal between the two hemispheres. The charcoal could be replaced through a small door in the wire gauze.

(via Wikimedia Commons)

John Tyndall’s respirator, 1871

The Irish physicist took Stenhouse’s mask and added a filter of cotton wool saturated with charcoal, lime and glycerin. The new device has filtered smoke and some noxious gases from air.

(via Wikimedia Commons and steampunksp)

Samuel Barton’s respirators, 1874

This respirator had rubber-and-metal face cover, glass eyepieces, rubber-coated hood and a metal canister on the front of the mask contained lime, glycerin-soaked cotton wool and charcoal.

(via Google Patent Search/148868)

Smoke-Excluding Mask, George Neally, 1877 and 1879

The first version had a filter carried on the chest, but two years later he patented another version with the filter mounted directly on the facepiece.

(via Google Patent Search – 1 and 2)

Fleuss Apparatus, 1878

The rubberized mask covered the whole face was connected via tubes to a breathing bag.

(via History of Diving Museum)

…[Read More - See All HERE!]

And why?

Simply this…

Given the news of late, of the viruses (Thanks, Science–You guys SUCK!!!!) that could spark a Global Outbreak?

I’m getting far more that just a tad bit concerned:

[via Independent.Uk.co] ‘Appalling irresponsibility’: Senior scientists attack Chinese researchers for creating new strains Made in chinaof influenza virus in veterinary laboratory ~by Steve Connor

Experts warn of danger that the new viral strains created by mixing bird-flu virus with human influenza could escape from the laboratory to cause a global pandemic killing millions of people.

Senior scientists have criticised the “appalling irresponsibility” of researchers in China who have deliberately created new strains of influenza virus in a veterinary laboratory.

They warned there is a danger that the new viral strains created by mixing bird-flu virus with human influenza could escape from the laboratory to cause a global pandemic killing millions of people.

Lord May of Oxford, a former government chief scientist and past president of the Royal Society, denounced the study published today in the journal Science as doing nothing to further the understanding and prevention of flu pandemics.

“They claim they are doing this to help develop vaccines and such like. In fact the real reason is that they are driven by blind ambition with no common sense whatsoever,” Lord May told The Independent.

…[Read More]

So?

I might start looking into the whole gas mask deal.

And what can I say…

But I like to know all the makeups of my options.

All of which?

Freak terrifying!

Ugh.

LONDON (AP) — 2 new viruses could both spark global outbreaks ~By MARIA CHENG

Two respiratory viruses in different parts of the world have captured the attention of global health officials – a novel coronavirus in the Middle East and a new bird flu spreading in China.

Last week, the coronavirus related to SARS spread to France, where one patient who probably caught the disease in Dubai infected his hospital roommate. Officials are now trying to track down everyone who went on a tour group holiday to Dubai with the first patient as well as all contacts of the second patient. Since it was first spotted last year, the new coronavirus has infected 34 people, killing 18 of them. Nearly all had some connection to the Middle East.

The World Health Organization, however, says there is no reason to think the virus is restricted to the Middle East and has advised health officials worldwide to closely monitor any unusual respiratory cases.

At the same time, a new bird flu strain, H7N9, has been infecting people in China since at least March, causing 32 deaths out of 131 known cases.

WHO, which is closely monitoring the viruses, says both have the potential to cause a pandemic – a global epidemic – if they evolve into a form easily spread between people. Here’s a crash course in what we know so far about them:

Q: How are humans getting infected by the new coronavirus?

A: Scientists don’t exactly know. There is some suggestion the disease is jumping directly from animals like camels or goats to humans, but officials are also considering other sources, like a common environmental exposure. The new coronavirus is most closely related to a bat virus, but it’s possible that bats are transmitting the disease via another source before humans catch it.

Q: Can the new coronavirus be spread from human to human?

A: In some circumstances, yes. There have been clusters of the disease in Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Britain and now France, where the virus has spread from person-to-person. Most of those infected were in very close contact, such as people taking care of a sick family member or health workers treating patients. There is no evidence the virus is spreading easily between people and all cases of human-to-human transmission have been limited so far.

Q: How are people catching the bird flu H7N9?

A: Some studies suggest the new bird flu is jumping directly to people from poultry at live bird markets. Cases have slowed down since Chinese authorities began shutting down such markets. But it’s unclear exactly what kind of exposure is needed for humans to catch the virus and very few animals have tested positive for it. Unlike the last bird flu strain to cause global concern, H5N1, the new strain doesn’t appear to make birds sick and may be spreading silently in poultry populations.

Q: What precautions can people take against these new viruses?

A: WHO is not advising people to avoid traveling to the Middle East or China but is urging people to practice good personal hygiene like regular hand-washing. “Until we know how and where humans are contracting these two diseases, we cannot control them,” said Gregory Hartl, WHO spokesman.

…[Read More]

And seemingly?

Just getting worse as the days go on.

Hmmm.

I wonder…

can I order ANY of these (see top article above) in bulk?

cause, I have a feeling…

We are all gonna be needing them.

Jeez.

Endangered due to technology

News Mash: U.S. broadcast networks are in trouble & this genius netflix flowchart could be why!

Not much of a surprise here…

Network TV ratings?

Are in a little bit of trouble.

And this trouble?

Definitely reflected via the lackluster “upfront” ad revenue selling season.

Yikes!

(Reuters) – U.S. broadcast networks head into their biggest ad-selling season this week, competing with streaming services like Netflix, battling online players for ad dollars, and fending off hits starring zombies and duck hunters on cable.

The increased competition will force ABC, CBS, Fox and NBC to settle for their lowest average rate hikes in three years during the “upfront” selling season, Wall Street analysts say.

During the upfronts, networks preview shows for their fall schedules, trying to persuade advertisers to buy billions of dollars worth of commercial time in advance.

The broadcasters still command premium ad prices because they reach an audience that is far bigger than the viewership of any single cable channel. Upfront rates likely will rise by 6 percent on average, as the broadcasters book about $9 billion worth of ad inventory during the upfronts, Barclays Capital estimates.

While 6 percent is well ahead of the 1.3 percent annual inflation rate, it is lower than the rich gains networks enjoyed in recent years. Upfront ad rates increased by 7.5 percent last year, and by 11.1 percent the previous year.

“For the networks, they probably feel very challenged that they have more competitors and are facing lower ratings,” said Mark Fratrik, chief economist at media research firm BIA/Kelsey.

“Advertisers have many more places to go to, so broadcasters are probably a little reticent of trying to push stronger (rates), even with this stronger economy,” Fratrik added.

Viewers’ biggest distraction is cable TV, which is churning out more hits that lure eyeballs from the Big Four. AMC’s zombie thriller “The Walking Dead” and the A&E reality show “Duck Dynasty” haul in broadcast-sized audiences. “Walking Dead” averaged 10.7 million viewers this season, more than all but the top 12 shows on broadcast TV.

Online video players such as Hulu and Google Inc’s YouTube are jockeying for ad dollars, and viewing hours are growing on Netflix, the streaming service that is making a big push into original programming with shows like political thriller “House of Cards.”

…[Read More]

Most of this trouble?

Due to the tremendous competition the Networks are receiving from other avenues…

When it comes to our TV viewing habits:

[via Gizmodo]This Genius Netflix Flowchart Will Tell You Exactly What to Watch ~by Lily Hay Newman

The going gets tough on Netflix sometimes. Between the eight people sharing your account it’s just not clear who has been marathoning Grey’s Anatomy, and the recommendations are all over the place. How are you supposed to find something to watch? With this brilliant flowchart, of course.

The “mad geniuses” at Silver Oak Casino want to help you figure it out for some reason. Maybe this flowchart will subtly entice you to gamble? Unclear. But it’s fabulously comprehensive regardless of motives. The flowchart shouts out such gems as Miller’s Crossing and Fawlty Towers, but will also guide you to more mainstream options if that is your destiny. Take the help where you can get it.

…[Read More]

The way we entertain?

Changing with the times.

And if Network TV does not keep up?

Yes…

Much like the newspaper?

IT will be the one left far behind.

Endangered due to technology

Bottoms up

News Mash: Scientific research has a money problem, and humanity? Has a scientific research problem!

Vicious circle.

The biggest problem with Science today?

Money.

And by “money” we are not talking a lack of funding…

As much as we are talking an overriding motivation behind search and discovery:

 [via Gizmodo]Why Is Science Behind a Paywall? ~by Alex Mayyasi – Priceonomi

Scientists’ work follows a consistent pattern. They apply for grants, perform their research, and publish the results in a journal. The process is so routine it almost seems inevitable. But what if it’s not the best way to do science?

Although the act of publishing seems to entail sharing your research with the world, most published papers sit behind paywalls. The journals that publish them charge thousands of dollars per subscription, putting access out of reach to all but the most minted universities. Subscription costs have risen dramatically over the past generation. According to critics of the publishers, those increases are the result of the consolidation of journals by private companies who unduly profit off their market share of scientific knowledge.

When we investigated these alleged scrooges of the science world, we discovered that, for their opponents, the battle against this parasitic profiting is only one part of the scientific process that needs to be fixed.

Advocates of “open science” argue that the current model of science, developed in the 1600s, needs to change and take full advantage of the Internet to share research and collaborate in the discovery making process. When the entire scientific community can connect instantly online, they argue, there is simply no reason for research teams to work in silos and share their findings according to the publishing schedules of journals.

Subscriptions limit access to scientific knowledge. And when careers are made and tenures earned by publishing in prestigious journals, then sharing datasets, collaborating with other scientists, and crowdsourcing difficult problems are all disincentivized. Following 17th century practices, open science advocates insist, limits the progress of science in the 21st.

…[Read More]

Unfortunately…

Not only does this hinder research?

But it dangerously contaminates the potential consequences of the Scientific findings…

Which directly affects us all!

(NaturalNews) Science will destroy humanity, says team of scientists ~by J. D. HeyesBottoms up

One of the primary goals of science is to advance knowledge and understanding to improve the human condition, but all too often this noble field of study has devolved into a profit-seeking quest for power, at the expense of mankind.

Indeed, the science of technology is perhaps the worst culprit, a team of mathematicians, philosophers and scientists at Oxford University’s Future of Humanity Institute is warning.

The team, in a forthcoming paper titled, Existential Risk Prevention as Global Priority, says humankind’s over-reliance on technology could lead to its demise, and that human beings are facing a risk to our own existence.

What’s more, the team says humankind’s demise is not far off; it could come as soon as the next century.

‘Threats we have no track record of surviving…

“There is a great race on between humanity’s technological powers and our wisdom to use those powers well,” institute director Nick Bostrom told MSN. “I’m worried that the former will pull too far ahead.”

Since our existence on this planet there have been those who have predicted the end of world as we know it, the latest “fad” in this realm being the hoopla surrounding the now-disproven 2012 Mayan prophesies. Still, folks can’t seem to let go of the notion that, at some point in our future, life on Earth will cease to exist.

From Bostrom’s paper:

Humanity has survived what we might call natural existential risks for hundreds of thousands of years; thus it is prima facie unlikely that any of them will do us in within the next hundred. This conclusion is buttressed when we analyze specific risks from nature, such as asteroid impacts, supervolcanic eruptions, earthquakes, gamma-ray bursts, and so forth: Empirical impact distributions and scientific models suggest that the likelihood of extinction because of these kinds of risk is extremely small on a time scale of a century or so.

In contrast, our species is introducing entirely new kinds of existential risk – threats we have no track record of surviving. Our longevity as a species therefore offers no strong prior grounds for confident optimism. Consideration of specific existential – risk scenarios bears out the suspicion that the great bulk of existential risk in the foreseeable future consists of anthropogenic existential risks – that is, those arising from human activity.

Continuing, Bostrom predicts that future technological breakthroughs “may radically expand our ability to manipulate the external world or our own biology.”

“As our powers expand, so will the scale of their potential consequences – intended and unintended, positive and negative.”

Bostrom goes onto say that well-known threats like an asteroid strike on the planet, supervolcanic eruptions and earthquakes likely won’t threaten humanity in the near future. Even a nuclear explosion won’t completely wipe out life; in that event, he says, enough people would survive to rebuild.

Rather, it is the unknowns that will wind up as a bane on the existence of humankind.

Science has an obligation to serve mankind

Not all of the news is bad, Bostrom says.

“The Earth will remain habitable for at least another billion years. Civilization began only a few thousand years ago. If we do not destroy mankind, these few thousand years may be only a tiny fraction of the whole of civilized human history,” he writes.

Mike Adams, The Health Ranger, notes in an Infographic posted here at NaturalNews that the onus for protecting humanity falls on those who are creating the technology.

“If an action or policy has a suspected risk of causing harm to the public or to the environment, the burden of proof that it is NOT harmful falls on those taking the action,” the graphic says.

Check out the rest of the graphic here.

…[Read More]

And…

Maybe even one day?

Sadly…

Will lead to our total destruction.